From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bragg v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 19, 2007
2:05-cv-0787-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2007)

Opinion

2:05-cv-0787-GEB-KJM-P.

June 19, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 1, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent's January 19, 2007 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Bragg v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 19, 2007
2:05-cv-0787-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Bragg v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS LEON BRAGG, Petitioner, v. THOMAS L. CAREY, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 19, 2007

Citations

2:05-cv-0787-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2007)