Brady v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Arnold v. State

    667 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that each time appellant unlawfully took money from the victim, he completed a separate and distinct crime, despite the fact that the victim remained the same

    "This evidence was sufficient to establish that [Arnold] used deceitful means and artful practice in order to induce [the victims] to part with [their] money." Brady v. State, 267 Ga. App. 351, 355 (1) (c) ( 599 SE2d 313) (2004). When Arnold took the first sum of money from a victim, the offense of theft by deception was completed.