Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Brady v. Hubbard

1 Citing case

  1. Sublett v. City of Tulsa

    1965 OK 78 (Okla. 1965)   Cited 48 times
    In Sublett, 405 P.2d 185, this Court reviewed a taxpayer challenge alleging that the ordinance authorizing a vote on the issuance of bonds did not specify the particular industries that would locate on the planned facilities in violation of the Oklahoma Constitution article 10, section 16, requirement that "[a]ll laws authorizing the borrowing of money... shall specify the purpose for which the money is to be used."

    Also see Goodall v. City of Clinton, 196 Okla. 10, 161 P.2d 1011; City of Tulsa v. Sikes, 196 Okla. 306, 164 P.2d 863; State, etc. v. Dunnaway, 207 Okla. 144, 248 P.2d 232. The holdings in the cited cases, and the conclusion reached herein, are not affected by the early decision in Brady v. Hubbard, 79 Okla. 210, 192 P. 567. This is for the reason that the action therein attacked, acquisition of land more than five miles outside the city limits, involved a matter of municipal concern, as to which the city charter was supreme so long as not in conflict with the Constitution.