From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brady-Davis v. Hartman

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 5, 2023
2:23-CV-559-JHC-DWC (W.D. Wash. May. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-559-JHC-DWC

05-05-2023

MARKIENA DESHANE BRADY-DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW D. HARTMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

David G. Estudillo, United States District Judge

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
(2) Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and leave to amend would be futile. Therefore, this case be dismissed and Plaintiff's Application to Proceed IFP is denied. This dismissal constitutes a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g).


Summaries of

Brady-Davis v. Hartman

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 5, 2023
2:23-CV-559-JHC-DWC (W.D. Wash. May. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Brady-Davis v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:MARKIENA DESHANE BRADY-DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW D. HARTMAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: May 5, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-559-JHC-DWC (W.D. Wash. May. 5, 2023)