From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Town of Boonville Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 16, 2012
93 A.D.3d 1228 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-16

In the Matter of Frances S. BRADLEY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. TOWN OF BOONVILLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Respondent.Forrest C. Bartelotte and Marilyn G. Bartelotte, Intervenors–Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)

Durr & Riley, Boonville, Peter M. Hobaica, LLC, Utica (George E. Curtis of Counsel), for intervenors-appellants. The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Meghan M. Manion of Counsel), for petitioner-respondent.


Durr & Riley, Boonville, Peter M. Hobaica, LLC, Utica (George E. Curtis of Counsel), for intervenors-appellants. The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Meghan M. Manion of Counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Town of Boonville Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 16, 2012
93 A.D.3d 1228 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Bradley v. Town of Boonville Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Frances S. BRADLEY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. TOWN OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 1228 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1971
939 N.Y.S.2d 905