Opinion
2012-03-16
In the Matter of Frances S. BRADLEY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. TOWN OF BOONVILLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Respondent.Forrest C. Bartelotte and Marilyn G. Bartelotte, Intervenors–Appellants. (Appeal No. 1.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (*899 Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered February 18, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order granted petitioner two variances.Durr & Riley, Boonville, Peter M. Hobaica, LLC, Utica (George E. Curtis of Counsel), for intervenors-appellants. The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Meghan M. Manion of Counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (*899 Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered February 18, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order granted petitioner two variances.Durr & Riley, Boonville, Peter M. Hobaica, LLC, Utica (George E. Curtis of Counsel), for intervenors-appellants. The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Meghan M. Manion of Counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988, 529 N.Y.S.2d 658; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567, 404 N.Y.S.2d 608; see also CPLR 5501[a][1] ).