From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-2470.

12-30-2022

Timothy Edison BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Timothy Edison Bradley, Live Oak, pro se. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Timothy Edison Bradley, Live Oak, pro se.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously affirmed the trial court's order denying Appellant's motion for postconviction relief in Lake County Circuit Court Case Number 2009-CF-002880-A. Because it appears that Appellant's postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Lake County Circuit Court Case Number 2009-CF-002880-A may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

APPELLANT CAUTIONED.

WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bradley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Bradley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Timothy Edison BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

353 So. 3d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)