From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 21, 1990
558 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

Nos. 89-1435, 89-1436.

March 21, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County, W. Fred Turner, J.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Dave Sutton, Certified Legal Intern, and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We reverse the departure sentences imposed in these consolidated appeals. While the timing of offenses may constitute a clear and convincing reason for departure, the offenses must establish a continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity. State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1988). Without a recitation by the trial court of additional facts supporting the timing of offenses, the fact that appellant committed three offenses in a ten-day period does not demonstrate a continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity. See State v. Simpson, 554 So.2d 506 (Fla. 1989); State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1987). After carefully reviewing the record and briefs in case no. 89-1435, we find no other reversible error. We reverse the consolidated appeals and remand for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range.

SHIVERS, C.J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bradley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 21, 1990
558 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Bradley v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY RAY BRADLEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 21, 1990

Citations

558 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Roa v. State

The second reason listed for departure, that the defendant is not amenable to probation because of the timing…