From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2009
61 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-06293.

April 21, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Pablo Rodriguez and Dreamon Limo, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baiter, J.), dated May 16, 2008, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellant.

Gruenberg Kelly, P.C., Ronkonkoma, N.Y. (John Aviles of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through the submission of the plaintiffs deposition testimony and the affirmation of their examining physician. However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact. Accordingly, the appellants' motion for summary judgment was properly denied ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324).


Summaries of

Bradley v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2009
61 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Bradley v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN BRADLEY, Respondent, v. PABLO RODRIGUEZ et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3114
876 N.Y.S.2d 888