From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2008
Case No. 3:08-cv-285-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-285-KRG-KAP.

December 29, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on December 17, 2008, docket no. 3, recommending that the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied and that a certificate of appealability be denied.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed timely objections, docket no. 4, which are meritless.

After de novo review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29 th day of December 2008, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, docket no. 6, is granted. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2008
Case No. 3:08-cv-285-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Bradley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. BRADLEY, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 29, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-285-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2008)