From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 1, 2008
Case No. 3:08-cv-24-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 1, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-24-KRG-KAP.

May 1, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on April 9, 2008, docket no. 8, recommending that the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim.

Plaintiff was notified at his last address, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that he had ten days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed two pleadings that he may have intended as objections, see docket no. 11 and docket no. 12; the time to file objections has expired.

After review of the record of this matter and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2008, it is

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, docket no. 6, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 1, 2008
Case No. 3:08-cv-24-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Bradley v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT JEFFREY PATRICK, S.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 1, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-24-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 1, 2008)