From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. General Counsel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 2, 2008
280 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6437.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: June 2, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00112-JPB-JSK).

Gardner Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Gardner Bradley appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. Gen. Counsel, for Cent. Office, BOP, No. 3:07-cv-00112-JPB-JSK, 2008 WL 713921 (Mar. 14, 2008). We deny Bradley's motion for a preliminary injunction and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bradley v. General Counsel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 2, 2008
280 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Bradley v. General Counsel

Case Details

Full title:Gardner BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, GENERAL COUNSEL, FOR CENTRAL OFFICE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 2, 2008

Citations

280 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008)