From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. City of Olympia

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 30, 2022
506 P.3d 644 (Wash. 2022)

Opinion

No. 100446-0

03-30-2022

Stephen T. BRADLEY, Respondent, v. CITY OF OLYMPIA, et al., Petitioners.



ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Yu, and Whitener, considered at its March 29, 2022, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied and Respondent Stephen Bradley's request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. Respondent Stephen Bradley is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent Stephen Bradley should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court /s/ González, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Bradley v. City of Olympia

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 30, 2022
506 P.3d 644 (Wash. 2022)
Case details for

Bradley v. City of Olympia

Case Details

Full title:Stephen T. BRADLEY, Respondent, v. CITY OF OLYMPIA, et al., Petitioners.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

506 P.3d 644 (Wash. 2022)