From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's cross motion to reduce the maintenance and life insurance obligations set forth in the judgment of divorce. Defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of those obligations (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Klapper v. Klapper, 204 A.D.2d 518, 519). Further, in denying the cross motion, the court properly declined to consider evidence of plaintiff's financial circumstances (see, Matter of Derrick v. Derrick, 162 A.D.2d 348, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 708).


Summaries of

Bradley v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Bradley v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:ARLENE BRADLEY, Respondent, v. ROBERT BRADLEY, SR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 690