From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Alcazar

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-1409 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1409 KJM CKD P

12-13-2021

JOSEPH MICHAEL BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. MANNY ALCAZAR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 5, 2021 are adopted in full;
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and
3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Alcazar

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-1409 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Bradley v. Alcazar

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MICHAEL BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. MANNY ALCAZAR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1409 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)