Bradley Min. Co. v. U.S.E.P.A

1 Citing case

  1. Carus Chemical Co. v. U.S.E.P.A

    395 F.3d 434 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 15 times
    Explaining that when the relevant statute does not specify an applicable standard of review, we "proceed under the standard prescribed by the [APA]"

    In applying that standard, we remain mindful of the "significant deference" we owe to the EPA's decision to list a site on the NPL because of the "highly technical issues involved" and because the NPL serves merely as a "rough list of priorities, assembled quickly and inexpensively." Bradley Mining Co. v. EPA, 972 F.2d 1356, 1359 (1992). Even so, we must assure ourselves the EPA has "examined relevant data and has articulated a rational explanation for its actions."