Bradley Min. Co. v. U.S.E.P.A

1 Citing case

  1. Tex Tin Corp. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    992 F.2d 353 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 17 times
    In Tex Tin, we vacated the NPL listing of a tin manufacturing facility because the EPA had failed to comply with our remand directing the agency to explain how a tin-production byproduct deposited arsenic in soil adjacent to the facility.

    The risk and magnitude of hazardous release into each of these three pathways is separately rated and then combined into an aggregate score; all sites receiving an HRS score of 28.50 or greater are listed on the NPL. See generally Bradley Mining Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 972 F.2d 1356, 1357-58 (D.C. Cir. 1992). The Agency first declared its intention to include petitioner Tex Tin's Texas City, Texas, smelting facility on the NPL in August 1990.