From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley Currier Co. v. Harrison

City Court of New York, General Term
Mar 1, 1898
23 Misc. 241 (N.Y. City Ct. 1898)

Opinion

March, 1898.

Otis Pressinger, for appellants.

Donald McLean, for respondent.


The plaintiff procured an order for the examination of the defendant Harrison as an adverse party under section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The order was served upon him, but no fees were paid him. Upon the return day of said order he appeared by attorney making the preliminary objection, that "Harrison had not been paid or tendered the fees prescribed by section 874 of the Code," which objection was overruled by the Special Term justice and an order was made requiring him to submit to an examination.

The order appealed from must be reversed. Unless waived by Harrison, it was the duty of the plaintiff to have paid him, upon the service of the order for his examination, the fees required to be paid in such instances prescribed in section 874; their failure to do so rendered the service of said order void and entitled him, upon its return day, to move for its vacation for that reason; the refusal to grant his motion to that effect, we think, was error and entitled him to a reversal of the order appealed from and also to a dismissal of the order for his examination. In view of this ruling it is not necessary to consider the questions presented by the appellants' counsel.

Order appealed from reversed, with costs.

O'DWYER, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Bradley Currier Co. v. Harrison

City Court of New York, General Term
Mar 1, 1898
23 Misc. 241 (N.Y. City Ct. 1898)
Case details for

Bradley Currier Co. v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:THE BRADLEY CURRIER CO., LIMITED, Respondent, v . ARTHUR B. HARRISON et…

Court:City Court of New York, General Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1898

Citations

23 Misc. 241 (N.Y. City Ct. 1898)
51 N.Y.S. 304

Citing Cases

Todd v. Silk Association of America

In this case the fees were neither paid nor tendered to the witness, nor was a copy of the order served upon…

Faust v. Baeyertz

It was decided that the plaintiff was entitled to the examination and the court invited suggestions to be…