From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. Watkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 6, 2012
3:12-CV-0886-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-CV-0886-B-BK

06-06-2012

JANAR BRADFORD, #11072625, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG WATKINS, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

______________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bradford v. Watkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 6, 2012
3:12-CV-0886-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Bradford v. Watkins

Case Details

Full title:JANAR BRADFORD, #11072625, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG WATKINS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

3:12-CV-0886-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2012)