From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Nov 17, 2009
1:09CV398, 1:03CR237-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2009)

Opinion

1:09CV398, 1:03CR237-1.

November 17, 2009


ORDER


On October 20, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss (docket no. 31) is granted, that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (docket no. 28) is dismissed, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Bradford v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Nov 17, 2009
1:09CV398, 1:03CR237-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Bradford v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY LLOYD BRADFORD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

1:09CV398, 1:03CR237-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2009)