Opinion
No. CV 06-0530 PHX-NVW (MEA).
June 20, 2006
ORDER
Before the court are Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 1), United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey's Report and Recommendation (doc. # 9), and Petitioner's Written Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 10).
The court has considered Petitioner's objections and reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The court agrees with the magistrate judge's determinations, accepts his recommended decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and overrules Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate").
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Aspey (doc. # 9) is accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (doc. # 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action.