From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2020
Case No. 2:17-cv-05756-JAK-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-05756-JAK-JC

12-22-2020

DOUGLAS G. BRADFORD, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and all of the records herein, including the November 12, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections. ///

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied, this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on petitioner's counsel and on respondent's counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 22, 2020

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bradford v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2020
Case No. 2:17-cv-05756-JAK-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Bradford v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS G. BRADFORD, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 22, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-05756-JAK-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2020)