From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. Olin Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Jun 4, 2008
Civil No. 07-124-CJP (S.D. Ill. Jun. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-124-CJP.

June 4, 2008


ORDER


The Court has been advised by the counsel for the parties that the above-captioned action has been settled.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice, without costs and with the right to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated within 60 days. The dismissal will automatically be with prejudice 60 days after the date of this Order, and final judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bradford v. Olin Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Jun 4, 2008
Civil No. 07-124-CJP (S.D. Ill. Jun. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Bradford v. Olin Corporation

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. OLIN CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Jun 4, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 07-124-CJP (S.D. Ill. Jun. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Carson v. Real Estate-Land T. T. Co.

slight effort, such as cleaning up leaves and doing odd jobs around the house, but was unable, as he…

Blackstock Oil Co. v. Murtishaw

But it must be borne in mind that the same exactness of proof in a compensation case is not required as in…