From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. NYLIFE Sec.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 3, 2022
22 Civ. 1931 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 1931 (AT)

11-03-2022

RADLEY BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. NYLIFE SECURITIES LLC, a New York company, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE:

The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled. ECF No. 28. Accordingly, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Coin! within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Corn! is dir ected to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bradford v. NYLIFE Sec.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 3, 2022
22 Civ. 1931 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Bradford v. NYLIFE Sec.

Case Details

Full title:RADLEY BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. NYLIFE SECURITIES LLC, a New York company…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 1931 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2022)