From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. NYLIFE Sec.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 10, 2022
22 Civ. 1931 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 10, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 1931 (AT)

05-10-2022

RADLEY BRADFORD, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NYLIFE SECURITIES LLC, a New York company, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court has reviewed the parties proposed case management plan and scheduling order. ECF No. 17. In the proposed order, the parties request 295 days for fact discovery because “the case is a putative class action.” Id. at 1. Based on this explanation, the Corn! does not find that this case presents unique complexities or other exceptional circumstances that would warrant such a profound departure from the Court's standard practice of allowing 120 days for fact discovery. See Sample Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. Accordingly, by May 17, 2022, the parties shall submit a letter providing good cause for an extension of the fact discovery period. If they fail to do so, the Court shall issue an order allowing 120 days for fact discovery.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bradford v. NYLIFE Sec.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 10, 2022
22 Civ. 1931 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Bradford v. NYLIFE Sec.

Case Details

Full title:RADLEY BRADFORD, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 1931 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 10, 2022)