From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. Mebane

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 7, 2021
2:21-cv-1410 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1410 JAM CKD P

12-07-2021

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. DARNELL MEBANE, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On November 5, 2021, the court ordered that plaintiff pay the $402 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff was warned that failure to pay the filing fee would result in dismissal. The deadline for payment of the filing fee has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Bradford v. Mebane

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 7, 2021
2:21-cv-1410 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Bradford v. Mebane

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. DARNELL MEBANE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1410 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)