From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. Kraus

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:19-cv-1753 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1753 KJM DB P

09-27-2021

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. PAUL R. KRAUS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendation, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 22.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2021, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 20) is denied.


Summaries of

Bradford v. Kraus

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:19-cv-1753 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Bradford v. Kraus

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. PAUL R. KRAUS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1753 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)