From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. City of Phx.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 3, 2022
No. CV-21-00187-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Mar. 3, 2022)

Opinion

CV-21-00187-PHX-SMB

03-03-2022

Deshaun Joaquin Bradford, Plaintiff, v. City of Phoenix, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

HONORABLE SUSAN M. BRNOVICH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Camille Bibles has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute. (Doc. 29). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 4) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No. objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the docket and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Judge Bibles. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R.

IT IS ORDERED accepting and adopting the R&R and dismissing this matter against all defendants without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and terminate this case.


Summaries of

Bradford v. City of Phx.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 3, 2022
No. CV-21-00187-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Mar. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Bradford v. City of Phx.

Case Details

Full title:Deshaun Joaquin Bradford, Plaintiff, v. City of Phoenix, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

No. CV-21-00187-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Mar. 3, 2022)