Bradford v. Astrue

Full title: LARRY BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 3, 2009

Civ. No. 09-6062-CL (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2009)

Opinion

Civ. No. 09-6062-CL.

November 3, 2009

ORDER

OWEN PANNER, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#21) is adopted. Defendant's motion to dismiss (#16) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.