From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braden v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 24, 2022
3:13-CR-45-TAV-DCP-7 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-CV-142-TAV-DCP 3:13-CR-45-TAV-DCP-7

08-24-2022

JEFFREY SCOTT BRADEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence [Doc. 1; Case No. 3:13-cr-45 (“Criminal Case”), Doc. 2091]. Because defendant has already litigated a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the merits [see Criminal Case Docs. 1599, 1864, 1865], the instant motion challenging his sentence is a second or successive one. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, petitioner cannot file a second or successive § 2255 motion in this Court until he has moved in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for an order authorizing this Court to consider the motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). The Court has not received any such order. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this motion [Doc. 1; Criminal Case Doc. 2091] to the Sixth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 for authorization.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Braden v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 24, 2022
3:13-CR-45-TAV-DCP-7 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Braden v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY SCOTT BRADEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

3:13-CR-45-TAV-DCP-7 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 24, 2022)