From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braddock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 15, 1998
979 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73828

OPINION FILED: September 15, 1998 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 6, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE EMMETT O'BRIEN, JUDGE.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE, and MOONEY, JJ.


ORDER


Movant, Leonard Braddock, appeals the denial on the merits of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Braddock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 15, 1998
979 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Braddock v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD BRADDOCK, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 15, 1998

Citations

979 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)