BRADBERRY v. T-MOBILE, USC, INC.

Full title: BRADBERRY, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE, USC, INC. et al. Defendants. Bradberry…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 10, 2008

Case No. C 06-06567 CW, Case No. C 07-05298 CW, Case No. C 07-03407 CW, Case No. C 08-00013 CW, Case No. C 07-06496 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. C 06-06567 CW, Case No. C 07-05298 CW, Case No. C 07-03407 CW, Case No. C 08-00013 CW, Case No. C 07-06496 CW.

March 10, 2008

MICHAEL J. STORTZ (State Bar No. 139386), BETH O. ARNESE (State Bar No. 241186), DRINKER BIDDLE REATH LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant, AT T MOBILITY LLC.

ORDER

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District JudgePage 2

Based on the stipulation of the Parties and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.

1. The Court denies without prejudice to renoticing the pending motions set forth in the Court's February 15, 2008 Amended Case Management Scheduling Order for Reassigned Cases; and (b) stays all responsive pleading deadlines.

2. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to April 15, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. At that time, the Parties shall propose new dates for a Case Management Scheduling Order. The Parties will also address a proposed schedule for responsive pleading deadlines at that time.

Pursuant to stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED as modified.