From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brackett v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

March, 1932.


Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for leave to amend complaint granted on condition that plaintiff stipulate that the original date of issue remain unchanged; on the ground that the record shows that the plaintiff was entitled to amend so that she could put her pleading in such shape as to enable her to litigate upon the trial all the questions affecting the rights of the parties; that such amendment might properly have been made on the trial (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 166): and that there is no prejudice to any substantial right of defendants by permitting such amendment. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brackett v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Brackett v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:LAURA M. BRACKETT, Appellant, v. VALENTINE W. SMITH and NORMAN R. JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Matter of Dutcher

In her first complaint, served December 27, 1930, appellant pleaded an action in equity based on the contract…