From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bracken v. Simmons First Nat'l Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Jun 9, 2014
Civil Action No. 6:13-1377-TMC (D.S.C. Jun. 9, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:13-1377-TMC

06-09-2014

Joel Clay Bracken, Plaintiff, v. Simmons First National Bank, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging a claim pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the South Carolina Consumer Protection Code, and the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that the court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 83). Although advised of his right to do so, Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report, and the time to do has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the court adopts the magistrate judge's Report (ECF No. 83) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (ECF No. 67) is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 80) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
June 9, 2014
Anderson, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Bracken v. Simmons First Nat'l Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Jun 9, 2014
Civil Action No. 6:13-1377-TMC (D.S.C. Jun. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Bracken v. Simmons First Nat'l Bank

Case Details

Full title:Joel Clay Bracken, Plaintiff, v. Simmons First National Bank, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 9, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:13-1377-TMC (D.S.C. Jun. 9, 2014)

Citing Cases

Cole v. Montgomery

2. Federal Trade Commission Act Violations Claims (Count Eight)Additionally, this court should summarily…