From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brackeen v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01677-RBJ-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2013)

Summary

In Brackeen v. Brown, 2013 WL 328937 (D.Colo. Jan. 8, 2013), Magistrate Judge Tafoya recommended that a CODC defendant's motion to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds be denied because "the law is clearly established that inmates have a First Amendment right to receive information while in prison and that prison officials may not censor prisoners' incoming publications unless the censorship is reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest," citing Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 (1974).

Summary of this case from Griffin v. Gorman

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01677-RBJ-KMT

01-08-2013

MICHAEL BRACKEEN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN BROWN, SR (BCCF), JAN BRYANT (BCCF), TOM CLEMENTS (CDOC) MARSHALL GRIFFITH (CDOC), JOSIE LOPEZ (BCCF), MELINDA MARTON (BCCF), TERESA REYNOLDS (CDOC), BRIGHAM SLOAN (BCCF), MARLENE YBARRA, (BCCF), ARI ZAVARAS (CDOC), STEVE BROWN JR (BCCF), and JASON SANCHEZ (CDOC), Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by District Judge R. Brooke Jackson, pursuant to the Order of Reference dated March 23, 2012. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b).

It is hereby ORDERED that a Preliminary Scheduling Conference is set for January 30, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado.

The parties need not comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. and 26.1. The purpose of the initial conference is to consider the nature and status of the case, the timing for filing of any motions, and what discovery, if any, will be needed.

Plaintiff, or his/her case manager, shall arrange for his/her participation via telephone and shall call (303) 335-2780 at the scheduled time.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

Kathleen M. Tafoya

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brackeen v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01677-RBJ-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2013)

In Brackeen v. Brown, 2013 WL 328937 (D.Colo. Jan. 8, 2013), Magistrate Judge Tafoya recommended that a CODC defendant's motion to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds be denied because "the law is clearly established that inmates have a First Amendment right to receive information while in prison and that prison officials may not censor prisoners' incoming publications unless the censorship is reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest," citing Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 (1974).

Summary of this case from Griffin v. Gorman
Case details for

Brackeen v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BRACKEEN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN BROWN, SR (BCCF), JAN BRYANT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01677-RBJ-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

White v. Baldridge

299 F.3d 1173, 1180 (10th Cir. 2002); see also Brackeen v. Brown, No. 11-cv-01677-RBJ-KMT, 2013 WL …

Gunsallus v. Hestand

Because Defendant Griffith is a Grievance Officer for the CDOC [## 1 at 3; 17 at 2], he may “assert Eleventh…