From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brackbill v. Ruff

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2022
CIVIL 1:17-CV-01046 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:17-CV-01046

03-31-2022

CALVIN E. BRACKBILL, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN J. RUFF, et al., Defendants.


WILLIAM I. ARBUCKLE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

JENNIFER P. WILSON, JUDGE

AND NOW, on this 31st day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Doc. 76, the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle, Doc. 100, and the parties' responses thereto, Docs. 108, 110, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The court DECLINES TO ADOPT the portions of the report and recommendation denying Defendants' motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiff's claims for false arrest; failure to intervene with respect to Defendant Hill; procedural due process violations/fabricated evidence; state law malicious prosecution; and state law abuse of process. (Doc. 100.) The court ADOPTS the remaining portions of the report and recommendation. (Id.)
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. 76.)
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Brackbill v. Ruff

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2022
CIVIL 1:17-CV-01046 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Brackbill v. Ruff

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN E. BRACKBILL, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN J. RUFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 1:17-CV-01046 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022)