From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brabson v. Giroux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 3, 2018
Civil Action No. 15-1501 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-1501

10-03-2018

WAYNE F. BRABSON, Petitioner, v. MS GIROUX, Superintendent, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA IN HARRISBURG, PA, Respondents.

cc: Wayne F. Brabson FJ9568 10745 RT 18 Albion, PA 16475 Counsel for Respondents (Via CM/ECF electronic mail)



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Wayne F. Brabson ("Petitioner") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and docketed on December 7, 2015. (ECF No. 3.) That Petition was referred to a United States Magistrate pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

On August 22, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation wherein she recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as untimely and that a certificate of appealability be denied. (ECF No. 23.) The Report and Recommendation was served on the parties with a deadline to file written objections set for September 10, 2018. As of today, no objections have been filed.

If a party does not file timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the party may lose its right to de novo review by the district court, although the court must still give "reasoned consideration" to the magistrate judge's report before adopting it. Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987). --------

After careful de novo review, the following Order is now entered.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2018;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (ECF No. 23) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 3) is dismissed as untimely filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter Judgment in favor of Respondents and mark this case closed.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

/s/ Joy Flowers Conti

Joy Flowers Conti

Chief United States District Judge cc: Wayne F. Brabson

FJ9568

10745 RT 18

Albion, PA 16475

Counsel for Respondents

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Brabson v. Giroux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 3, 2018
Civil Action No. 15-1501 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Brabson v. Giroux

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE F. BRABSON, Petitioner, v. MS GIROUX, Superintendent, and THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-1501 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2018)