From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braaksma v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Sep 13, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-48-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 13, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-48-DPM.

September 13, 2010


ORDER


Having exercised its discretion in light of the governing precedent, the Court grants Plaintiffs' motion to voluntarily dismiss their case without prejudice on a condition. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) (d); Paulucci v. City of Dulth, 826 F.2d 780, 782-83 (8th Cir. 1987); Kern v. TXO Production Corp., 738 F.2d 968, 970-73 (8th Cir. 1984). Because the case has proceeded so far, the dismissal is conditioned on Plaintiffs paying Defendant (within thirty days of any refiling) any Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) costs and any attorney's fees incurred in this case that will be sunk and lost by the nonsuit. Most of Defendant's costs and attorney's fees, of course, will not be lost — the answer, the mutual discovery, and the motion papers can all be recycled if Plaintiffs refile. Kern, 738 F.2d at 972-73.

The parties should confer and try to stipulate to Defendant's lost costs and attorney's fees. If they cannot agree by 30 September 2010, then Defendant should certify and file a list of what it believes to be its reasonable lost costs and fees; Plaintiffs should respond as soon as possible; the Court will enter a further order after considering the details.

So Ordered.

13 September 2010


Summaries of

Braaksma v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Sep 13, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-48-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Braaksma v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:DIANA BRAAKSMA, individually, and as parent, natural guardian, and next…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Sep 13, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-48-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 13, 2010)