B.P. v. State

Full title: B.P., A CHILD, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court: Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 10, 1992

604 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1992)

Opinion

No. 78911.

September 10, 1992.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — Case No. 91-2097.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We quash B.P. v. State, 588 So.2d 39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), on the authority of A.A. v. Rolle, 604 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1992), and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Rolle.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., dissent.