From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.P v. Bostock

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 7, 2024
2:23-cv-00890-KKE (W.D. Wash. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00890-KKE

02-07-2024

B.P. and her minor child, L.E.S., Plaintiffs, v. DREW H. BOSTOCK, Field Office Director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Seattle Field Office; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security; TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; TROY A. MILLER, Acting Commissioner of Customs and B Protection; MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, Defendants.

NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT MATTHEW ADAMS, WSBA No. 28287 CHRISTOPHER STRAWN, WSBA No. 32243 TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney Nickolas Bohl, WSBA No. 48978 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Attorneys for Defendants I certify that this memorandum contains 159 words, in compliance with the Local Rules


NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT

MATTHEW ADAMS, WSBA No. 28287

CHRISTOPHER STRAWN, WSBA No. 32243

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney

Nickolas Bohl, WSBA No. 48978

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Attorneys for Defendants

I certify that this memorandum contains 159 words, in compliance with the Local Rules

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

KYMBERLY K. EVANSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants' motion to dismiss is currently pending. The parties believe that the Court's decision on that order will define the scope of necessary discovery, if any. In light of that, the parties believe it is best to preserve their resources and wait to determine how to approach discovery and other pretrial issues and scheduling until after the Court issues its order. Thus, there is good cause for, and the parties stipulate to extending the current deadlines set by the Court regarding initial disclosures and a Joint Status Report until two weeks after the Court issues its order regarding Defendants' pending motion to dismiss.

Subject to the Court's approval, the parties stipulate to and request the following:

1. The current deadline to file a Joint Status Report and serve initial disclosures is extended until two weeks from the date the Court issues an order on Defendants' pending motion to dismiss.

ORDER

The parties' stipulated motion for extension of initial case deadlines (Dkt. No. 38) is GRANTED. The previous deadlines (Dkt. No. 36) are VACATED. Any necessary case deadlines will be set after the pending motion to dismiss is resolved.


Summaries of

B.P v. Bostock

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 7, 2024
2:23-cv-00890-KKE (W.D. Wash. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

B.P v. Bostock

Case Details

Full title:B.P. and her minor child, L.E.S., Plaintiffs, v. DREW H. BOSTOCK, Field…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-00890-KKE (W.D. Wash. Feb. 7, 2024)