From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BP Corp. N. Am. v. Invista S.A.R.L.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 11, 2018
2017-1890 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2018)

Opinion

2017-1890

05-11-2018

BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC., Appellant v. INVISTA S.A.R.L., Appellee

ROBERT CARPENTER, BP America, Inc., Naperville, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES LEE LOVSIN, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL. MARTINA TYREUS HUFNAL, Fish & Richardson, PC, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellee. Also represented by CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, San Diego, CA; JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,316.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT CARPENTER, BP America, Inc., Naperville, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES LEE LOVSIN, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL. MARTINA TYREUS HUFNAL, Fish & Richardson, PC, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellee. Also represented by CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, San Diego, CA; JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 11, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

BP Corp. N. Am. v. Invista S.A.R.L.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 11, 2018
2017-1890 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2018)
Case details for

BP Corp. N. Am. v. Invista S.A.R.L.

Case Details

Full title:BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC., Appellant v. INVISTA S.A.R.L., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 11, 2018

Citations

2017-1890 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2018)