From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B&P Co. v. TLK Fusion Entm't, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 19, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-276 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-276

03-19-2013

B&P COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TLK FUSION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER

The Court having been advised by counsel that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown not later than April 18, 2013, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upon approval of the Court. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

This Court explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by the parties, on motion or sua sponte.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

B&P Co. v. TLK Fusion Entm't, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 19, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-276 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

B&P Co. v. TLK Fusion Entm't, LLC

Case Details

Full title:B&P COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TLK FUSION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-276 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 19, 2013)