From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BOYO v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Dec 14, 1972
72 Misc. 2d 165 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)

Opinion

December 14, 1972

Halpern Brown for plaintiff.

John G. deRoos for defendant.


This is a motion by a 75-year-old plaintiff to perpetuate her testimony pursuant to CPLR 3101 [subd. (a), par. (3)].

Defendant opposes the motion on the ground that plaintiff has failed to submit a medical affidavit showing a probability that she will not survive until the time of trial.

Effective September 1, 1970 the Legislature amended CPLR 3403 by adding paragraph 4 of subdivision (a), which grants a trial preference "in any action upon the application of a party who has reached the age of seventy-five years." This amendment reflects legislative consideration of the mortality tables.

In light of this amendment, it is the court's view that CPLR 3101 should be construed so as to give effect to the age of a movant seeking relief thereunder.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion is granted solely by reason of her advanced age.


Summaries of

BOYO v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Dec 14, 1972
72 Misc. 2d 165 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)
Case details for

BOYO v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES BOYO, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Dec 14, 1972

Citations

72 Misc. 2d 165 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)
339 N.Y.S.2d 501

Citing Cases

Ludwig v. Ludwig

The issue thus presented is whether the defendant's age of 80, alone, is a sufficient basis for directing his…