From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boykins v. Serjant

United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana
Feb 2, 2023
2:22-cv-00587-JPH-MG (S.D. Ind. Feb. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00587-JPH-MG

02-02-2023

MAURICE DANTRELL BOYKINS, Plaintiff, v. SIMMERMAN Serjant, et al., Defendants.


TO: Warden, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER PAYMENT

James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana

The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted through the assessment of an initial partial filing fee. That sum has been paid. However, plaintiff is still obligated to pay the remainder of the three hundred and fifty dollars ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). "All § 1915 has ever done is excuse pre-payment of the docket fees; a litigant remains liable for them, and for other costs, although poverty may make collection impossible." Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996).

In order to provide for the orderly payment of the balance of the filing fee owed in this case, the Court directs the following:

1. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of MAURICE DANTRELL BOYKINS, 285506, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court at 46 East Ohio Street, Room 105, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, consistent with paragraph 2 of this Entry. The appropriate cause number, 2:22-CV-00587-JPH-MG, should be placed on each payment sent to the Clerk.

2. The sums withheld and forwarded shall be twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the inmate's account. "Income" means all deposits including settlement proceeds, gifts, or bequests from family.Such sums shall be forwarded to the Clerk each time the amount in the inmate's account exceeds Ten Dollars ($10.00) until the filing fee is paid.

Lucien v. DeTella, 141 F.3d 773, 776 (7th Cir. 1998).

3. As of the issuance of this Order, the balance of the filing fee still due in this case is $293.96.

4. A copy of this Order shall be sent to plaintiff and to plaintiff's custodian.

5. If other orders have been issued directing the withdrawal of 20% of the plaintiff's funds for other cases, these orders shall cumulate and therefore, for example, if there are currently three such court orders in effect, 60% of the plaintiff's income shall be withheld each month and remitted to the Clerk each time the account balance exceeds Ten Dollars ($10.00).

SO ORDERED.

Distribution

All ECF-registered counsel of record via email

MAURICE DANTRELL BOYKINS

285506

WABASH VALLEY - CF

WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels

Electronic Service Participant - Court Only

Warden

WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

6908 S. Old U.S. Hwy 41

P.O. Box 1111

CARLISLE, IN 47838

Financial Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Boykins v. Serjant

United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana
Feb 2, 2023
2:22-cv-00587-JPH-MG (S.D. Ind. Feb. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Boykins v. Serjant

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE DANTRELL BOYKINS, Plaintiff, v. SIMMERMAN Serjant, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana

Date published: Feb 2, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00587-JPH-MG (S.D. Ind. Feb. 2, 2023)