From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boykin v. Curry

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Jan 21, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-224 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 21, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 5:08-CV-224 (CAR).

January 21, 2009


ORDER


In accordance with provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act , a Waiver of Reply has been filed on behalf of defendants CURRY and BRYANT. The filing of such a waiver compels the court to review plaintiff's complaint and determine whether plaintiff has a "reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits" of his claim(s). Upon conducting such a review, the undersigned finds that plaintiff does have a reasonable opportunity to prevail herein on the merits of his complaint against these defendants, at least to the extent that further factual and legal development is necessary.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the defendants shall WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of receipt of this order file an answer to plaintiff's complaint and/or any dispositive motion(s) as may be permitted by the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

SO ORDERED AND DIRECTED.


Summaries of

Boykin v. Curry

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Jan 21, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-224 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Boykin v. Curry

Case Details

Full title:RODREGUS LEE BOYKIN, Plaintiff v. LT. PATRICK CURRY and SGT. KENNETH…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Jan 21, 2009

Citations

NO. 5:08-CV-224 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Esposito v. Racine Cnty. Jail

Although Plaintiff may have desired to have pictures taken of his injuries, Plaintiff does not have a…