From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boykin v. City of North Las Vegas

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 28, 2011
2:09-cv-02373-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

2:09-cv-02373-RLH-GWF Consolidated with: 2:10-cv-00737-RLH-GWF.

October 28, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. On April 21, 2011, the Court granted a stay of discovery until a ruling was made on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#50). A revised joint scheduling order was due ten (10) days after the Court entered its order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. An Order granting in part and denying in part the Motion to Dismiss was entered on August 31, 2011 (#53). To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order no later than November 8, 2011. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.


Summaries of

Boykin v. City of North Las Vegas

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 28, 2011
2:09-cv-02373-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Boykin v. City of North Las Vegas

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY BOYKIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, and JOSEPH…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

2:09-cv-02373-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 28, 2011)