From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyer v. East

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1898
25 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

February Term, 1898.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Ward, J., who favored a modification in a memorandum.


I think the defendants East are protected by the Recording Act and want of notice, but there is satisfactory evidence that the defendant Palmer was in collusion with the mother of the plaintiffs in effecting the mortgage sale and vesting title thereunder in the mother to the mortgaged property which was conveyed by her immediately to the defendant Palmer in fraud of the rights of the plaintiffs, who were infants at the time, and the judgment should be so modified that it be reversed as against the defendant Palmer and the action be permitted to continue as to him.


Summaries of

Boyer v. East

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1898
25 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

Boyer v. East

Case Details

Full title:James E. Boyer and Daniel W. Boyer, Appellants, v. Ellenor East and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1898

Citations

25 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
49 N.Y.S. 1132