From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Wal-Mart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Feb 6, 2012
C.A. No. 1:11-424-TLW-JRM (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2012)

Opinion

C.A. No. 1:11-424-TLW-JRM

02-06-2012

Joyce Boyd, Plaintiff, v. Wal-Mart, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is now before the undersigned for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joseph R. McCrorey on April 27, 2011. In his Report, Magistrate Judge McCrorey recommends that the Complaint in the above-captioned case be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance or service of process. During the time period for filing objections, Plaintiff filed correspondence indicating that she did not receive the proper form paperwork from the Court. Plaintiff asks that she able allowed the opportunity to bring her case into proper form. In light of these additional filings, the Court finds it appropriate to remand this case to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration.

Accordingly, the Court DECLINES to accept the Report, and remands this case to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration in light of Plaintiff's additional filing. If the Plaintiff fails to timely bring her case into proper form, she will face dismissal of her action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

TERRY L. WOOTEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
February 6, 2012
Florence, South Carolina


Summaries of

Boyd v. Wal-Mart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Feb 6, 2012
C.A. No. 1:11-424-TLW-JRM (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Boyd v. Wal-Mart

Case Details

Full title:Joyce Boyd, Plaintiff, v. Wal-Mart, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 6, 2012

Citations

C.A. No. 1:11-424-TLW-JRM (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2012)