From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 23, 2013
506 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7856

01-23-2013

SAMUEL BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VICKI MONTGOMERY, Director/CEO; RONALD O. FORBES, MD, Medical Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.

Samuel Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00349-JRS) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Boyd appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Boyd's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Boyd has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The order is final and appealable as something more than an amendment to the complaint is needed to cure the defects in Boyd's case. See Domino Sugar v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Boyd v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 23, 2013
506 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Boyd v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VICKI MONTGOMERY, Director/CEO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

506 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013)