From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Haynes

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 19, 2008
294 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6500.

Submitted: September 16, 2008.

Decided: September 19, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:07-hc-02081-FL).

Harold Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carta Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Harold Boyd, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent on one of Boyd's claims. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Carp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Boyd seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Boyd v. Haynes

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 19, 2008
294 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Boyd v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:Harold BOYD, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Superintendent J. HAYNES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 19, 2008

Citations

294 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2008)